NASCAR has filed a counterclaim against Michael Jordan-owned 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports alleging they “willfully” violated antitrust laws in connection with the most recent charter agreements.

NASCAR sued 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports, saying in court documents that the two companies want to eliminate the charter system.

NASCAR filed a countersuit Wednesday in U.S. District Court against 23XI Racing, Front Row Motorsports and 23XI Racing co-owner Curtis Polk. Here are questions and answers about the matter: 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports filed an antitrust lawsuit against NASCAR and NASCAR Chairman Jim France on Oct.

NASCAR has now brought a counterclaim against the teams and Curtis Polk — a 23XI co-owner who has advised Jordan for decades.

NASCAR fires back at 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports with a lawsuit, alleging they orchestrated a scheme to pressure the sport into submission.

NASCAR stated in court documents that the two teams and Curtis Polk “embarked on a strategy to threaten, coerce, and extort NASCAR into meeting their demands for better contract and financial terms.”

NASCAR filed a counterclaim Wednesday against 23XI Racing, Front Row Motorsports and 23XI Racing co-owner Curtis Polk, alleging violations of the Sherman Act and conspiracy. “Beginning no later

NASCAR has filed a countersuit against Front Row Motorsports and Michael Jordan’s 23XI Racing over the teams’ refusal to sign the 2025 charter agreement. FRM and 23XI had previously sued NASCAR over the agreement,

NASCAR attorney Christopher Yates went so far as to tell The Associated Press that Polk, who in addition to being Jordan’s business manager is a co-owner of 23XI along with thre

NASCAR never asked for a charter system, but ironically, it finds itself defending the business model as it takes on 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports. Chris Yates, the league’s lead counsel,