Two federal courts hold the use of copyrighted books by Meta and Anthropic as training data for AI systems does not infringe ...

Five authors accused Anthropic of copying millions of books that were purchased, scanned, and pirated to train the Anthropic ...

A summary of select court decisions addressing whether the use of copyrighted materials to train generative AI (GenAI) tools constitutes fair use.

There are dozens of similar copyright lawsuits working through the courts right now, with cases filed against all the top ...

Big tech companies recently secured legal victories allowing free use of copyrighted content. This will reshape the internet ...

A federal judge said Meta and OpenAI's use of copyrighted works to train their Llama and ChatGPT AI model was "fair use." ...

Anthropic didn’t break the law when it trained its chatbot with copyrighted books, a judge said, but it must go to trial for allegedly using pirated books.

A California federal judge ruled Anthropic can use copyrighted books to train its Claude AI model without authors' consent ...

Third Circ grants first ‘fair use’ AI and copyright appeal in Thomson v ROSS ROSS Intelligence bid pays off in dispute with Thomson Reuters | First case of its kind to reach any Circuit court | ...

Every original creation is an act of generative recombination. Why should the use of AI be held to a different standard?

Predictive tools made possible by advances in machine learning techniques may help clinicians make more accurate decisions about who should be allocated costly therapies, such as immunotherapy, which ...

The companies said in the lawsuit that Midjourney's AI image- and upcoming video-generation technologies "blatantly incorporate and copy Disney's and Universal's famous characters" without proper ...