News
Five authors accused Anthropic of copying millions of books that were purchased, scanned, and pirated to train the Anthropic ...
A summary of select court decisions addressing whether the use of copyrighted materials to train generative AI (GenAI) tools constitutes fair use.
There are dozens of similar copyright lawsuits working through the courts right now, with cases filed against all the top ...
Big tech companies recently secured legal victories allowing free use of copyrighted content. This will reshape the internet ...
A federal judge said Meta and OpenAI's use of copyrighted works to train their Llama and ChatGPT AI model was "fair use." ...
Anthropic didn’t break the law when it trained its chatbot with copyrighted books, a judge said, but it must go to trial for allegedly using pirated books.
A California federal judge ruled Anthropic can use copyrighted books to train its Claude AI model without authors' consent ...
Every original creation is an act of generative recombination. Why should the use of AI be held to a different standard?
Disney and Universal just sued Midjourney for scraping their IP—ushering in a major showdown over how AI is trained.
A new effort using only openly licensed data may have implications on thorny policy disputes around copyright and AI ...
The report concluded that while some use cases of AI training would fall under fair use, including research and education, using copyrighted materials to create competing commercial works would not.
The 108-page report deals primarily with copyright concerns around the training of AI models -- specifically, whether AI companies have legal footing to ask for a fair-use exception, which would ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results