Five authors accused Anthropic of copying millions of books that were purchased, scanned, and pirated to train the Anthropic ...

A summary of select court decisions addressing whether the use of copyrighted materials to train generative AI (GenAI) tools constitutes fair use.

A federal judge said Meta and OpenAI's use of copyrighted works to train their Llama and ChatGPT AI model was "fair use." ...

Anthropic didn’t break the law when it trained its chatbot with copyrighted books, a judge said, but it must go to trial for allegedly using pirated books.

A California federal judge ruled Anthropic can use copyrighted books to train its Claude AI model without authors' consent ...

A new effort using only openly licensed data may have implications on thorny policy disputes around copyright and AI ...

The report concluded that while some use cases of AI training would fall under fair use, including research and education, using copyrighted materials to create competing commercial works would not.

The 108-page report deals primarily with copyright concerns around the training of AI models -- specifically, whether AI companies have legal footing to ask for a fair-use exception, which would ...

But while "training a generative AI foundation model on a large and diverse dataset will often be transformative," the office said that "not every transformative use is a fair one," especially if ...

Please respond and use your voice to fight back against the copyright deniers. I’m hopeful that one day we’ll see the emergence of smaller models, ethically trained on clean data.