News

New York Yankees player Jazz Chisholm Jr. proved cleats are not a necessity to score in baseball, earning himself the ...
Travis Scott collaboration has been absolutely dominant in the shoe game since he arrived on the scene. Whether you normally ...
SKU: DZ5485-008 MSRP: $185 USD Release Date: August 23 Where to Buy: Nike Update: We’ve been tracking the return of the Air Jordan 1 High OG “Shattered Backboard” for nearly an entire year now.
In his latest interview with GQ on June 17, 2025, Pusha T opened up about why he aimed a diss track at Travis Scott. Pusha recalled an incident that occurred with Scott back in 2023 at Louis ...
There's never been a better time to buy a pair of "rare" Air Jordan shoes. Finish Line is selling Air Jordan 1 High OG "Rare Air" men's shoes for only $113. The list price of the sneakers is $185 ...
UPDATE (06/17): Official images of this year's "Shattered Backboard" Air Jordan 1 High have emerged ahead of the July 12 release. Grab a closer look at the retro below.
The veteran rapper, who’s basically seen every type of hip-hop drama imaginable during his decades in the game, isn’t buying into any narrative that suggests Travis Scott will just let this slide.
Chief Marketing Officer of Jordan Brand Caitlin Sargent offers a glimpse into what life would be like without the Air Jordan ...
Seasonal suitability maps for Aedes aegypti eggs in 200 m resolution covering the urbanized area of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, for 2019. Credit: The Lancet Planetary Health (2025). DOI: 10.1016/S2542 ...
Indiana came back from a 15-point deficit in the fourth quarter, and Tyrese Haliburton nailed a 21-foot jumper with 0.3 seconds left to claim a 111-110 win in Game 1 of the NBA Finals.
Can’t miss Air Jordan sales at Nike right now Air Jordan 1 Mid SE - Women’s was $140, now $120 Air Jordan Legacy 312 Low - Women’s was $150, now $113 Air Jordan 1 Low - Men’s was $115, now $87 ...
Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce was the subject of retirement rumors throughout the beginning of the offseason, but does not appear to have actually considered the possibility that strongly.