News
Opinion
11hOpinion
LGBTQ Nation on MSNThe Supreme Court’s anti-trans ruling was dirty politics. Here’s why we shouldn’t lose hope.What happened after the court's infamous anti-gay ruling of 1986 could happen again now, but with trans people at the forefront.
In a landmark victory for children's health and science-based medicine, the Court upheld a Tennessee law protecting minors from harmful gender experiments.
Patients of PHA Healthcare, a treatment program in Baltimore, were housed in drug-ridden buildings where many overdosed, an ...
Third Baptist Church in San Francisco honored civil rights legend Rev. Dr. Amos Brown with pastor emeritus status after 49 ...
The ruling is part of a troubling Christian Nationalist trend that excludes certain groups from self-determination.
Lawyers and plaintiffs in the Supreme Court case that legalized gay marriage worry about the future but also find reasons for ...
Rhode Island’s Democratic-controlled state House on Friday approved legislation that would ban the sale and manufacturing of ...
A few days later, Justice Clarence Thomas explained why this is not acceptable judicial procedure. Justice Thomas’s comments came on June 18 in his concurring opinion in United States v. Skrmetti. In ...
4dOpinion
Them on MSNClarence Thomas Cited the NYT 7 Times in His Skrmetti Opinion. Trans Activists Saw This Coming All AlongIn this op-ed, LGBTQ+ news and culture writer Samantha Riedel discusses the New York Times’ ongoing coverage of trans people ...
This decision could set a tone for other challenges to laws barring transgender people from participating in sports, using ...
To a striking degree, the Skrmetti majority’s analysis relied on cases that restricted the right to choose abortion.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results