A review of the US Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. CASA, Inc., which held that federal district courts’ universal ...

After the Supreme Court largely axed universal injunctions, liberal groups are seeking to achieve a sweeping pause on Trump's ...

In a June 27 ruling, the Supreme Court granted the Trump administration’s request to partially halt nationwide injunctions ...

New Jersey Attorney General Matt Platkin argued that sweeping injunctions blocking the Trump administration’s policies could ...

Friday's decision stems from President Trump's executive order regarding birthright citizenship, but the Supreme Court ...

The court ruled that universal injunctions issued by lower courts likely exceed the authority Congress has granted them.

Supreme Court ruling is sweeping The majority opinion in Trump v. CASA held that universal injunctions, blocking laws or policies from being enforced against anyone, “likely exceed the equitable ...

Justice Barrett writes for the Court's majority that universal injunctions likely exceed the equitable power of federal courts.

When presidents have tried to make big changes through executive orders, they have often hit a roadblock: A single federal judge, whether located in Seattle or Miami or anywhere in between, could ...

During oral arguments at the Supreme Court, Solicitor General D. John Sauer noted that courts had issued 40 universal injunctions against the federal government, including 35 from the same five ...